Open-Response : Flat-Earth
Hit-Counter (Provided Free; Courtesy of FreeCounterStat
Re : Flat-Earth

Flat-Earth Theory is one of the biggest controversies that have ever arisen in recent years starting ever since around 2015CE (also around the time when Censorship & Suppression started becoming Rampant). This also seems to be around the time when the «Mandela-Effect» became more pronounced, but, I will write an article on that some other day when I get to it either out of necessity or just because it integrates with some other activity for which I may already be involved.

The only way the «debates/controversies» can ever be settled is for everybody to do various scientific-tests for themselves that definitively answer multiple questions if possible. Even better if said tests can be live-streamed for the entire world to see. Even better yet if live-streamed from multiple live-streaming cameras at various simultaneous-angles so that greatly negate the possibility of video-manipulation.

Although I certainly found fun and amusement in the past with how people responded to the idea/claim that the Earth is Flat, I need to make this very clear that, just because I managed to Achieve Straight-A's in Astronomy Classes, that knowledge still remains Book-Learned and Purely Academic since I have not actually obtained Telescopes and looked through them myself, nor have I obtained Prisms in order to Field-Test/Experiment with Spectroscopy nor the Doppler-Effect.

Similarly, I only have Academic-Knowledge of Flat-Earth Theory, for which it is similar to being Book-Learned, but, I suppose in the case of on-line discussion, what I know about it is literally also entirely Video-Learned, comments I have read, but, I have never actually taken a Telescope nor Camera for myself, zoomed out into the Distance, and, looked at and seen ships and/or buildings that are claimed to be things that should disappear if there is the existence of a curvature.

I also mentioned in my other thread, that, I found various reasons as to why people become former Flat-Earthers, and, one of them that seemed compelling, was this case that I read about a Flat-Earther who had disputes with his Globe-Earther friend as to the Shape of the Earth itself, who both decided to go to some lake if I remember correctly, one that I think is often mentioned in Flat-Earth Videos/Documentaries, and, agreed to use Laser-Lights (Laser-Pens) at night in order to test for curvature; apparently, according to what was mentioned, the laser-lights actually disappeared just before reaching the tops of their heads (don't remember the distance mentioned, but, probably somewhere anywhere from maybe a couple of feet to a few feet above from both sides of the lake...)

If it is true that buildings can still be seen in the distance, yet, laser-lights are disappearing above their heads at night for such a scientific-test, then, perhaps the size of this earth may be much larger than everyone has been taught by the conventional/main-stream. Additionally, according to Remote-Viewing Data, contrary to the Flat-Earths who claim that there are no such things as Satellites, such a thing as «Orbiting» does exist which was obtained a long time ago from this particular (and perhaps some other) Remote-Viewing Sessions...

Additionally, although a number of people do have their reservations about him, like him or not, one thing that he does seem to agree with, that, aligns with Flat-Earth Proponents, happens to be the claim that the Moon-Landing Footages were staged...

Additionally, a number of Flat-Earth Proponents seem to want to suggest that any sort of so-called «Alien-Invasion» would be fake, but, here is another perspective, and, that would be that... Aliens have essentially... already invaded, and, that, they control all of the Human-Societies via the use of the Legal-Systems, the Financial-Systems, and, the various other systems mentioned here by Paul Wallis...

With all of that mentioned, I am very glad and happy that Flat-Earthers, are indeed, questioning the main-stream and/or conventional-narratives/wisdom, but, I also do find it to be of a simultaneous concern that they may be making the same mistake of potentially adopting yet another «dogmatic» belief-system; for my own, personal-stance on these issues/controversies, I prefer to look at it as really bizarre phenomena that may simultaneously make everything true, depending on vantage-point, for reasons that might be difficult to explain or describe without getting into Quantum-Physics descriptions/explanations; you can think of the story of the five blind men who were told to describe what was before them (turned out to be an elephant). You see, for all I know, what everyone perceives as reality may potentially be something like a Quantum-Physics version of that Elephant, such, that, everybody is trying to describe a Multi-Shaped, Multi-Coloured, Multi-Dimensional Set of Dice, but, from different Vantage-Points.

Additionally, for all I know, the «reality» that you «see» may literally be different from the «reality» that someone else sees, even with the exact same scientific-instruments, such that, just like if you were to have «Unlocked a Quest» in a multi-player video-game, even though you can «see» the «Quest-World» that has been «unlocked» for you (perhaps you've met certain pre-requisite conditions, and, said conditions made the earth Flat, from your metaphorical monitor-screen, anyway), but, for those who have not yet met the pre-requisite conditions, they may have a monitor-screen (metaphorically) that still depictes a globe or sphere rather than a flat-plane-existence, and, obviously, various «disagreements» will result until and unless either side can overcome their current «dogmatism» (upon which case this may unlock yet another pre-requisite condition that possibly changes the reality of the very nature of the world/planet itself). I don't try to insist that you need or should try to believe in this or that, regarding the structure of reality, because, for all I know, the very so-called laws of physics could change on us for any number of reasons; the only «dogmatism» that I adhere to revolves around Cause-and-Effect otherwise known as the Karmic-System which stipulates... : «Everything that you or your servants do or express unto others will be done or expressed unto you (and if not in the current life then in the next or some other future existence without exception).» (and this is in exact-measure, for every eye you take, the same amount of eyes you lose, but no more; for every tooth you break, the same amount of your own teeth are broken, but no more; the amount of «suffering» you are made to endure never exceeds the amount of suffering that you have been complicit to causing others to suffer, but, all «collateral» suffering is also counted as your complicity; you are complicit to myriads of iniquities via voting for mortals who punish/oppress/control others and also for paying the taxes that fund such iniquities)